Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cumbia sonidera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:NOQUORUM, closing in favour of delete. There is agreement to delete this page and to restore material at the Mexican cumbia article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Cumbia sonidera

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An unsourced article written in so bad English that it's hard to make any sense out of it. The article was created 6 March 2008, and it has less than 200 edits. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  20:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mexican cumbia. It's hard to find reliable sources, at least in English, and it's mentioned as a subgenre in Mexican Cumbia, it should be possible there to mention the differences. --OpenFuture (talk) 07:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for chiming in, OpenFuture! Indeed, it seems that Cumbia sonidera was part of the Mexican cumbia article still back in 7 March 2008‎, before the user Mexicumbia transformed the section into its' very own article. He seems to have communicated this here and here.
 * I'd suggest the deletion of this article, and restoring the previous material at Mexican cumbia. What do you think? :-P Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree. --OpenFuture (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.