Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cupex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Cupex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced "recently developed" term. Neither source given uses the word "cupex" or mentions the supposed inventor of the process, M.R Bakhshandeh, and Google only has four or five results for "cupex" "copper leaching" and "cupex" "bakhshandeh", all of them Wikipedia mirrors. McGeddon (talk) 07:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: until reliably established and not as OR being disseminated by article creator using Wikipedia. Quis separabit?  22:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches found nothing good at all so delete for now until this can be improved. SwisterTwister   talk  05:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Response to the Comments Thanks for your helpful consideration. We should explain the resources of the development process (CUPEX) by M.R. Bakhshandeh. This method has been approved by the State Organization for Registration of Deeds and Properties, Intellectual Property Center (http://iripo.ssaa.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=3974) on 13 August 2007 with No. 41954. We have attached the picture file of the approval document (IPC Prove Document.jpg). It is also approved by the Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST) - Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology (MSRT) (http://en.irost.org/) on 24 September 2008 with No. 415/966. We have also attached the picture file of the approval document (IROST-MSRT.jpg). We have also added some sentences in the Wikipedia page in order to mention such approval documents. Since the approval for invention registration in our country has been just proved by providing such documents, it is not possible to add another references such as published paper, patent, or others. Please let us know if there is something we could do in order not to delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zarbarg (talk • contribs) 14:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete an article can not be based solely on primary sources Kraxler (talk) 13:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editors.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.