Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cupid (Santa Claus's reindeer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Santa Claus's reindeer. Courcelles 00:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Cupid (Santa Claus's reindeer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is already an article for this subject, Santa Claus's reindeer, so we don't need this article. The new material here is dubious and only appears to be supported by unreliable sources. Bennyhui (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. A seperate article for each reindeer is totally unecessary. They are not independently notable, and having their own article is disproportionate to the sources and material available.-- K orr u ski Talk 12:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable reindeer. Totally unnecessary to have a separate article. Redirect to main article at Santa Claus's reindeer. -- Brangifer (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge any reliably sourced material to Santa Claus's reindeer and redirect. Rlendog (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect as with the other seven reindeer. --MelanieN (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - And to those advocating a merge, what exactly is there to merge? Note that WikiAnswers is not a reliable source so the article's verifiable content is essentially that this is one of Santa's reindeer which is pretty much covered by Santa Claus's reindeer. -- Whpq (talk) 17:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.