Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curb your dog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. No prejudice towards a referenced, non dictionary-definition article being created subsequently. Neil  ╦  09:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Curb your dog

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Article otherwise not notable. Captain  panda  03:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is unencyclopedic in substance. Moreover, the subject is not notable as well. It is also impossible to find reliable sources for this article. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 03:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Under the idiom subsection of Wikipedia is not a dictionary  Citi Cat   ♫ 03:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep "Curb your dog" has been reasonably discussed by at least 2 language analysis websites: and, giving it a certain degree of notability. However, the article doesn't have much context, and would need to be cleaned up.--Kylohk 08:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are actually quite a few sources at Google Books. And apparently even the misunderstanding is sourceable with a citation to H. L. Mencken, a notable writer on language. --Dhartung | Talk 20:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.