Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CureROM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

CureROM

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Utterly non-notable piece of software, no independent coverage per WP:N. Tried to redirect, anonymous user says no, so I say let's kill this with fire unless someone finds the third party sources hbdragon88 (talk) 20:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to software blacklist. Due to CureROM's simplistic and underground nature, mainstream press is unlikely to provide significant coverage of it, which means that it probably can't hold its own article and may warrant total deletion. But I'd also note that CureROM is one of the best-known programs within this domain, and for the same reasons as above, some leeway might be considered in regard to quality of sources (they exist, but may not be strictly reliable). Ham Pastrami (talk) 22:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 02:58, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 04:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - as above. No references or sources independent of the subject. gm_matthew (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.