Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curmudgeon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @137  · 02:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Curmudgeon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

With the risk of sounding like a curmudgeon myself, this article is little more than a WP:DICTDEF and list of people to whom this characterization is attributed, largely without references, so a it's an obvious WP:BLP issue. Pcap ping  17:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * COMMENT - I agree that the article as it stands fails to qualify under both of the criteria cited above. However, I believe the article could be saved with rewriting, adding more information and links, along the lines of the final paragraph.
 * I doubt that. I could cite a source saying that Lou Dobbs is a curmudgeon (Jon Stewart in The Daily Show), but that kind of info is going to have serious POV issues even if sourced. Pcap ping  18:38, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * delete, you can't say anything about curmudgeons, all you can do is make a list of so-called curmudgeons. Polarpanda (talk) 20:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The definition is already covered at Wiktionary. The WP:OR list tacked on the end doesn't make this an encyclopedia article.--Michig (talk) 08:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hasn't got any better since mid 2008 when it was created to replace a redirect to a Nirvana album, and it never will. It's just a word, not a concept or topic. Fences  &amp;  Windows  21:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.