Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Currency (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per author request (G7). Jamie  S93  21:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Currency (film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The creator contested the prod. All that I can find for this is IMDB. Joe Chill (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Please keep this article active for at least the next few months while new data rolls in. Film festival URLs, press and official website are forthcoming. It will save me the trouble of having to add again after deletion. Thank you for considering. Rosierbrad (talk) 01:54, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna go with a tentative keep here. The film appears to be in post production per IMDB (yes, I know), which tells me it has a release date, but there's not much more on here.  Leave it here and fix for now. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:29, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You wouldn't have trouble with that when the current article is a sentence long. You should have waited to create the article when there was enough sources. Joe Chill (talk) 01:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

That's a good point. Go ahead and delete it if that's the policy, Joe. I'll just repost when it's more relevant in a few months. Sorry, I'm a newbie. Thanks. Rosierbrad (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Also, another quick question if you have time to respond, Joe. How do I post the article Currency (film) so that it appears in the disambiguation section of the term "currency". Like now, it says Currency (album), etc. Does that make sense? Do you know how I'd go about doing that? Thank you. Rosierbrad (talk) 03:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Joe Chill (talk) 02:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, and Brad should steer clear of making an article for his own film. If it is in post then once released it will get coverage and the article will follow, and the EL are mainly to Brad or the film's pages. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NFF which states "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." I was unable to find any realiable sources attesting this film's principal photography commencement. Furthermore, had principal photography been confirmed via reliable sources, guidelines still state that unreleased films "should not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." I have no prejudice towards recreation of this article if and when principal photography can be confirmed and the notability criteria are met. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Sorry for any trouble. I'll let someone else post it once it becomes relevant. Rosierbrad (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No trouble at all, Brad! These things can be a good learning experience to be used if and when you decide to contribute to this project. The fact of the matter is that the vast majority of editors here, same as yourself, started editing before they were familiar with the policies and guidelines that guide this project's development. The main thing is to stay civil and have an open mind to easily comprehend what we're all about. You've managed to do this well. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 17:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.