Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current news of india


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 14:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Current news of india

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, no significant coverage in reliable sources, content is unduly promotional and not verifiable. Was prodded for those reasons; prod removed by author, who also routinely removes maintenance tags, without improvement. Huon (talk) 14:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I have not identified any significant secondary source on this subject.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  12:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N, WP:GNG, WP:V. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:20, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Perhaps I should strike out my vote. After all, it is rubbish. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Nicely presented, useful info. Marswiks (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment This isn't about presentation, but about whether article is notable enough or verifiable. I find no news about this anywhere that can be used to prove either. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per the page's own source: "currentnewsofindia.com did not score particularly well" (sitescore.co). Their scoring criteria may well differ from WP:Notability (web), but it certainly doesn't bode well. Cnilep (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject lacks significant coverage in multiple wp:secondary, wp:independent and wp:reliable sources, therefore fails wp:general notability guideline and does not meet any of the WP:Notability (web) as well. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.