Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curse of Keith Hernandez (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was CSD G4 per Articles for deletion/Curse of Keith Hernandez

Curse of Keith Hernandez
Prod reason, in part: ''This is a major stretch for an article. It is not nationally known and all refs are from blogs. please delete or provide suitable citation or proof. '' Article creator has repeatedly removed prods without addressing their concerns or discussing - of course, numerous users (i.e., ) have re-prodded as well. This has been deleted before but I don't know if it's similar enough for a db-repost. Morgan Wick 03:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Two out of the three "sources" are from the same webpage. Arbusto 05:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No verifiable sources. I never even heard of this "curse" before.  Not to mention that every team save the defending champion could claim such a curse. Resolute 06:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Neo 06:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Charlesknight 08:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.