Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curse of Morrissey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  04:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Curse of Morrissey


Subjective, contrived, non-existent "curse". Can never be anything but Original Research. Not even notable as a meme: gets only 9 unique G-hits. wikipediatrix 01:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The Morrissey article doesn't even contain the word 'curse'. If this is mentioned at all, it should be there, and not without a citation. --Masamage 02:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete don't merge, until covered in reliable, mainstream sources. JChap2007 02:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 04:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge into Morissey, as per Masamage, if properly sourced. Stammer 10:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. -- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 16:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per failure of verification by reliable sources.--Isotope23 16:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like original research to me. LittleOldMe 16:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR.-- Shella * 17:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yep, pretty obvious OR.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per pretty much everything above! --11:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.