Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cursed Empire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only "keep" opinion admits that there's no reliable independent sourcing, and nobody makes any other argument to keep. WP:V is a core policy.  Sandstein  21:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Cursed Empire

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article on a game has just passed the 12 year mark without any references. A standard BEFORE (Google Books, Google News, newspapers.com, JSTOR) does not unearth any sources. Does not pass the WP:GNG. Chetsford (talk) 03:52, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:09, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep, on the grounds that the change of name due to a legal dispute with Lucasfilm should make it notable. That said, I was unable to find any non-self-referential coverage of this (hence the 'weak').Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 15:51, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Just in point of clarification, we have no RS that prove such a dispute ever occurred. I would also suggest that, per WP:INHERITED, companies don't achieve notability simply by once getting a cease and desist letter from a notable company (unless, of course, it was widely covered, which isn't the case here). Chetsford (talk) 20:56, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I believe I just said that.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 23:54, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem. I didn't think you expressed an issue with inheriting notability but I may have not read your comment closely enough. Chetsford (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment is a fan-review of the book.  I don't see references to meet GNG. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 18:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Vulcan's Forge. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Vulcan's Forge, or failing that merge to List of role-playing games by name. BOZ (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The trademark dispute was minor and there was no coverage of it at the time, no court records extant, and no subsequent notice of it. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.