Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curt Anderson (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Curt Anderson (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is not a needed disambiguation at all. Only one person is known by that name. The other guy's name may sound similar, but has two spelling differences (note: Kurt Andersen). In addition, no pages link here whatsoever. I have added Template:Distinguish tags on both pages to bypass this disambiguation, which therefore renders the dab useless. Tavix | Talk  19:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary dab, maybe even G6. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnecessary dab. Triplestop (talk) 19:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Navigational assistance properly handled with hatnotes on the two possibly-confused entries. -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment : and I do not understand this at all. Disambiguation pages cannot be prodded? Why not? (I suppose there's a better place for that question though.) -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * See here. Tavix | Talk  22:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This is silly - there is no reason to waste time forcing these to AfD when a simply hat note serves the same purpose. I view PROD deletion of these as perfectly valid (and fortunately many admins do allow them to be deleted via PROD). --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:04, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That discussion seems to have ended with "if dabs use AfD, then they should be prod-able". Is that right? -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The discussion seemed to end that RFD should accept DABs... Perhaps dabs should be handled at MfD then? 70.29.208.129 (talk) 07:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia talk:VfD ended (I think) with leaving disambiguations under AfD. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.