Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curt Anderson (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --QEDK ( T &#128214;  C ) 11:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Curt Anderson (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Facebook and Intelius do not count towards notability; the other sources listed (Jesusfreakhideout, The Ithaca Growler, 365 Days of Inspiring Media, etc.) do not appear to have sufficiently wide readership base to be considered reliable measures of notability. Dream Records is not a sufficiently big label to sign with. KDS 4444 Talk  12:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  15:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  15:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: This musician is notable per No. 1, where his music has been covered in two reviews by Jesus Freak Hideout, a review by 365 Days of Inspiring Media, and one in Hallels. Where they are found on the Christian music sources list to prove general notability has been achieved by coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject themselves.The Cross Bearer (talk) 19:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I found an interview in Hallels, and worked it into the article.The Cross Bearer (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I am going to ping some other editors who have monitored by stuff on a regular basis with regards to this artist deletion discussion, who are . I am going to ping some other editors in the CCM project, who are.
 * Keep. The sources look reliable enough to me, although I think the Facebook stuff should be relegated to an external link. White Arabian Filly  ( Neigh ) 02:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The Facebook about page link is directly related to showing what his date-of-birth (dob) is, or else I could prove it by using a tweet from his official website linked Twitter account, per self sourcing.The Cross Bearer (talk) 13:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * While Facebook isn't the best source, it is acceptable unless you're planning to go to GA or whatever with an article. I still think the article should be kept because the news sources prove notability. White Arabian Filly  ( Neigh ) 22:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Needs a More Legitimate Source.CalabJessika (talk) 10:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Please, I hope you clarify your remarks above.The Cross Bearer (talk) 20:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , I really don't think a brand-new editor like CalabJessika is even qualified to vote on AfDs. I actually thought that to vote on them editors needed to be autoconfirmed. White Arabian Filly  ( Neigh ) 19:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not the least bit worried about their vote, while I hope someone can explain to me the relevant policy with regards to this matter.The Cross Bearer (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * At the Teahouse, I was told that votes by people who do not use proper procedure are not counted. White Arabian Filly  ( Neigh ) 01:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as this seems convincingly enough. SwisterTwister   talk  23:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.