Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis & Hayes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Curtis & Hayes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing significant but another startup company for being encyclopedia. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a Startup directory. 1000s of startups happens every day. Just another one. Notability required repeated significant coverage by media as well as significance in itself. Definitely getting funded by VC, and building Wikiepdia page for their publicity, releasing articles on major media about discussing future plans, investments other press material. covered mostly by Startup blogs not the notable media. If seen then left only 1 paragraph to say and other are non-notable history and discussing business models. Just because they belong to elite group of funded startup does not mean they are Encyclopedia notable. Definitely the article is written by close associate or company itself. Light2021 (talk) 20:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * delete two of the "RSes" are literally a reprinted press release, one is a slight rewrite of the same press release - David Gerard (talk) 09:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:PROMO. Fails WP:NCORP. Anup   [Talk]  07:28, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- corporate spam on a non notable entity. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.