Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis Dagenais


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 15:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Curtis Dagenais
Listed for speedy deletion, but I don't think an article about a man who allegedly murdered two police officers has "no assertion of notability." I don't know our precedents on criminal articles very well, so whether he's notable or not I'll leave to others. No vote. -- SCZenz 04:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I realize such events are less common in Canada than the US, but even so, a criminal killing police officers is not really that notable. Wikipedia is not Canada's Most Wanted. Fan-1967 04:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable killer still on the loose, his name recieves 12,600 Google hits and scores of news stories. tmopkisn tlka 05:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BIO: "The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person." -- H·G (words/works) 06:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please the killer is notable and verifiable Yuckfoo 06:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:BIO per HumbleGod's explanation. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 09:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:BIO and HumbleGod's comments. Article may need some some cleanup though. We should use caution dealing with ongoing events involving accused but not-yet-convicted criminal suspects. Scorpiondollprincess 16:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per HumbleGod's quoting of the WP:BIO criteria. RFerreira 00:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This is going to be a big deal for a long while, he just turned himself in and there is going to be a trial that will probably be followed nation-wide. Also, WP:BIO.  DMighton 23:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.