Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttermaran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Cuttermaran

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. PROD placed by IP editor who may not know policy, PROD removed by relatively new user who doesn't recognize notability policy. Quick search for sources only reveals 9 WP:GHITS which argues pretty strongly that the IP was right. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 17:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete we used to have a higher tolerance for articles on obscure open source projects, but generally we require some independent significant coverage these days. Gigs (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I searched a couple forums on what tools people are using to cut/split videos, and Cuttermaran never showed up in any of the suggestions. If the people who do this task regularly don't even know about/recommend this software, then I think it fails the notability test. Livitup (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources = no article.   Snotty Wong   babble 18:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Snottywong. Jclemens (talk) 18:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a single reliable source is used. The company might be notable, but the only choice is to delete until someone proves it as such. HeartSWild (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.