Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber-Ark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 03:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Cyber-Ark

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is a blatant advertisement; furthermore, this is not a notable company Janegrafton (talk) 23:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Enough ghits and news coverage [ http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&num=100&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Cyber-Ark%22&sa=N&tab=wn] Defender of torch (talk) 09:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although there appears to be limited coverage of the company itself, they have been referenced in numerous articles as a reliable and noteworthy source in their field. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.