Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberCoders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  07:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

CyberCoders

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet the notability guideline for organizations: lacks independent, reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject. Though searching I've only found brief mentions in the context of job postings and blog-style reviews of their services; no substantive discussion of the company itself. The only sources in the article are routine coverage of an acquisition, an interview by the company who acquired them, and an inclusion in a list by Forbes. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: no evidence of meeting NCORP. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.