Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberCrime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Computer crime. Courcelles 23:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

CyberCrime

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Meandering essay and original research Fiddle   Faddle  18:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 18:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Computer crime. Let me explain this a little. There was a show on TechTV that called itself CyberCrime that ran for about 2 years. However we don't have enough sources to show that it ultimately merits its own article. Now why I'm suggesting that this redirect to computer crime over TechTV is that you can see where various editors have clearly mistaken this article for the actual cyber crime article. (The term with spaces redirects to computer crime.) Redirecting this to the TechTV article would probably be confusing, so I recommend redirecting this title to computer crime and creating a redirect by the name of CyberCrime (TV series) that goes to TechTV. I'll probably create the redirect myself, so all that would be left is deleting and creating the above suggested redirect to computer crime. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Computer crime. I agree with Tokyogirl79.  The TV show doesn't seem to warrant its own article, and it could easily be confused with the generic term.  I thought this was going to be a meandering essay on computer crime before I actually read the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.