Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber Stampede


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Cyber Stampede

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be a non-notable organization. The article was created by a now-indefinitely-blocked sock of an editor who abused multiple accounts for promotional purposes. See Sockpuppet investigations/Aximilli Isthill. (My opinion is that this individual is an undisclosed paid editor.) The references do nothing to support notability of this company: some are non-independent, many include only passing mentions, some appear to be rehashes of press releases. Deli nk (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of significant coverage needed to meet WP:NCORP. My online searches turned up only a smattering of press releases, but no detailed coverage by independent sources. Altamel (talk) 01:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, blatantly puffed-up advertisement - I assume someone's been looking for other articles the sock farm has worked on substantially? - David Gerard (talk) 13:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I have nominated a few others for deletion: Articles for deletion/Mammoth Lakes Real Estate, Articles for deletion/Brookhaven (Retreat), and Articles for deletion/MPay. Deli nk (talk) 15:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO. With sections such as "Notable Clientele" and "Awards", this article is purely "corporate spam". K.e.coffman (talk) 06:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.