Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberathlete Amateur League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Weak keep. Cbrown1023 talk 01:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Cyberathlete Amateur League

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet WP:WEB, no independent WP:RS to indicate notability. Leuko 04:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * seems independent RS. Keep or Merge with Cyberathelete Professional League--ZayZayEM 07:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Possibly independent (but it reads like a press release), but definitely not a reliable source. And why are you suggesting merging with a non-existent article? Leuko 07:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think he meant Cyberathlete Professional League (people should check their spelling first). TJ Spyke 07:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * fixed it.--ZayZayEM 11:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 07:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Cyberathelete Professional League; not notable enough on its own, but the article name is a useful redirect. A Train take the 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and condense while doing so. Realkyhick 23:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The initial purpose seems like a desire to explain that CPL/CAL are both different entities except now CPL owns a financial stake in CAL. Any suggestions to salvage or should it be merged wtih TheCPL as suggested above? ZBrannigan 19:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep as a notable entity. --Habap 16:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as CPL and CAL are separate entities. Both are notable individually. -- Laurens Hoek 15:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Would you two mind explaining why you think this is notable? TJ Spyke 00:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * CAL is the largest online gaming league in North America, with thousands of members. This is reason enough, I guess ;-). -- Laurens Hoek 01:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * An unsourced claim. TJ Spyke 03:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep seperate articles. Notability is given, reliable sources exist... Merging shouldnt happen as CPL is already over the recommended article size.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 17:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.