Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberjets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Autobots. Or wherever subsequent discussion may determine  Sandstein   16:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Cyberjets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Substub on a toy line. No evidence of notability and no sources cited. A prod was contested with the mystifying claim that this is acting as a disambiguation page "of sorts". Josh Milburn (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Transformers (toy line), which seems like the most applicable place, even though it's not mentioned there. Deletion is alright, too, as there seem to be something like five incoming links from mainspace.  I don't see significant coverage in independent reliable sources, which is actually slightly surprising to me, because I thought this sort of thing would probably get at least a few scattered trivial mentions on Google Books. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It is basically a disambiguation page now. How about turning it into one? --Pmsyyz (talk) 08:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * What would it disambiguate? There don't seem to be any other articles on Wikipedia called "cyberjet" or "cyberjets". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Yellow Dingo &#160; (talk)  10:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Transformers (toy line) per NinjaRobotPirate.  Nha Trang  Allons! 18:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect, but to List of Autobots as it is mentioned there at the section level. MB  04:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.