Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberpeacefare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Spinning Spark  10:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Cyberpeacefare

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is a non-notable neologism without any references. - MrX 00:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Google News and Books provided nothing for Cyber peacefare but the main Google search engine provided several results which are insufficient or unreliable (social networking). There's nothing to improve this article to Wikipedia standards. SwisterTwister   talk  01:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a dictionary definition of a neologism. No search results for news sites or books. Fails the general notability criteria.-- xanchester  (t)  02:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow delete - "Cyberpeacefare" probably was made up for the Wikipedia article name. No sources, doesn't meet WP:GNG. The post material could be copyvio. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates WP:V. -- Kinu  t/c 22:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.