Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberpunk (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No consensus between keeping and incubating, but there seems to be a consensus not to delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Cyberpunk (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Recently announced video game, but unfortunately video games get cancelled all the time, and per WP:TOSOON we shouldn't have an article yet. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Lots and lots of coverage already:. Also, Category:Cancelled video games. --Niemti (talk) 05:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * WP:TOSOON makes no mention of video games, concentrating on films and biographies. It would seem that it's up to a rather large amount of interpretation. There's every reason to think that the game will be completed at a future date, given that CD Projekt RED has dedicated developers and assets from previous projects to the title, have been working on it for "some time", already have the engine created (same engine as The Witcher 2), and have the creator of the pen-and-paper series on board as as collaborator for writing. If it does get cancelled, it can be tossed into the cancelled (though that's very unlikely given the dedication of the company involved) games category. :) --MusicaleCA (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Why not just create the article when the game is coming out? Wikipedia has no deadline. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * *shrug* I figured it'd be good to have a page so fans of CDPR who're watching this release could find something on wikipedia and by finding it, be encouraged to contribute to it as news is available. Point was to get the ball rolling...so to speak. :) --MusicaleCA (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, maybe merge to CD Projekt - While personally I'd have waited, a game announced by a major publisher is likely going to remain notable even if it is cancelled. There's sufficient sources to talk about the game in depth (Google news: ) though again, were it me, most of that could go into CD Projekt's article. However, deleting a noted project announcement just because of the chance it might be cancelled is not good form. --M ASEM  (t) 18:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Merge/incubate/redirect for the time being if you wish, but from the coverage available it would be notable enough for an article even if it got cancelled today. In any case, nothing to delete here — Frankie (talk) 16:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Deleting an article on the premise that the developers might cancel the project is simply unreasonable; there is significant coverage for the article in Forbes, Edge Magazine, and PC Gamer. Mephistophelian (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Incubate - seems to be WP:TOOSOON - all we have is "X is working on Y which should do Z and might be called A". - The Bushranger One ping only 04:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.