Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberscience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Cyberscience
nn, advertising. Company only garners 776 hits on Google. Fails WP:CORP. み使い Mitsukai 03:38, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. JoshuaZ 03:41, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Jabencarsey 03:41, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ad for nn company. Fan1967 04:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't even try to establish notability. Ad per nom.   Kuru   talk  05:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisment, WP:CORP violation.  (aeropagitica)   07:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising. J I P  | Talk 07:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, At this time it is just advertising. Afonso Silva 12:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, ad, nn company. --Ter e nce Ong 14:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per User Kuru's reason. Thomas Buckwalter 18:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advert for nn company. -- Krash (Talk) 15:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.