Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cycle (2021 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv 🍁  02:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Cycle (2021 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable film that does not meet the requirements of NFILM / GNG. All the coverage is WP:ROUTINE-press releases. Could not find any review in WP:BEFORE, both English and Telugu. Ab207 (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Plenty of sources. Articles like this do not appear to be press releases, and should count towards establishing notability. NemesisAT (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * However, one such source is not sufficient. Significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources needed per GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  08:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The source of Times of India confirms that the principle photography has been completed. Another source says that the official teaser has been released. It passes WP:NFF. Imfarhad7 (talk) 21:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Completion of filming is not a criteria to meet NFF; the production itself being notable per the notability guidelines is, which does not appear to be the case here. Teaser or trailer being released is WP:ROUTINE coverage and it does not meet the standard of WP:NFSOURCES. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the sources are indeed routine and run of the mill; and I can't quite find anything else either. The film has long been released, so this indicates it isn't a case of WP:TOOSOON. It just didn't attract any significant coverage. Too bad, we're an encyclopedia, not an unselective directory. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.