Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyclical Dumbening


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 06:44, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Cyclical Dumbening
Self-proclaimed original research - squibix 12:16, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 12:26, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * If anyone can re-write this in a bit more academic style and provide a few refs, then keep. The problem is worldwide. -- RHaworth 17:19, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not the place for this, even if the problem is worldwide.  Anville 20:28, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete original research. - Mgm|(talk) 16:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Rogerd 04:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research/essay. Aecis praatpaal 11:59, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.