Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cycloc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sockpuppet investigations/Nrk666 -- RoySmith (talk) 00:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Cycloc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spam article creates by a paid editor in violation of the TOU. I blocked the editor yesterday, and today a Lazarus account (last edit in 2008) came alive to remove the PROD tag. Not notable and native advertising, so we delete it. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Every morning   (there's a halo...)  15:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Every morning   (there's a halo...)  15:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Post-declarations are not a get out  of jail free card, and enough  of us have been round the block  enough  times to  recognise a blatant  exploitation for  money of our  voluntary  work  when we see it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.