Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cymatic Theology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Cymatic Theology

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * Delete. Unreferenced to any reliable sources re expression "Cymatic Theology", original research, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 10:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Refs claimed seem to be to irrelevant real works (A. Einstein from 1950?) or to probable vanity press. OR concerns seem valid--possible hoax or promotion as well. Jclemens (talk) 19:50, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverified, probably hoax. Google search turns up only six hits for this phrase, five of which are to Wikipedia pages. I could not verify the existence of a Dr. Mark Pretorius at the University of Pretoria, who supposedly coined the phrase (in fact the name was unlikely enough that it set off my BS alarm). If it isn't a hoax, it is at best an essay or original research. --MelanieN (talk) 06:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)MelanieN
 * Delete Non-notable theory at best, probable hoax. Edward321 (talk) 14:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.