Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cymdeithas Edward Llwyd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM applies. ✗ plicit  01:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Cymdeithas Edward Llwyd

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a Non-notable orginization. It doesn't appear to meet wikipedia's notability guidelines and should be deleted--Steamboat2020 (talk) 17:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  23:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 19.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I have expanded the article a little and have added some reliable sources. It is still weak, but there may be more material available in Welsh-language sources. It this is assessed as insufficiently notable then it should be replaced with a redirect to Edward Lhuyd. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.