Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cymphonix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 09:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Cymphonix

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable company who's lack of significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources means it fails to meet the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).  Esradekan Gibb   "Talk" 01:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  —    Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since only coverage seems to take the form of press releases. Cordless Larry (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. is a potential reference, but it's still basically a press release.  Probably not quite enough to pass WP:CORP at the moment, but closer than many companies. Tevildo (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.