Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cynthia Stokes Brown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Cynthia Stokes Brown

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 20:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Satisfies WP:AUTHOR. Warden (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Her books seem to be widely held, which would satisfy WP:PROF #1. For example, the "refusing racism" book is held by >600 institutions and the "connecting" book by almost 300. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC).
 * Week keep. GS h index of 9 helps WP:Prof. Warden implies the need for a more comprehensive and helpful nomination. I agree. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep as the authro of several academic books, it is probably worth having an article on her. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.