Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cynthia Thielen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep; clear consensus that the subject meets WP:POLITICIAN. (non-admin closure)  Gongshow  Talk 09:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Cynthia Thielen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be sufficiently notable. Herp Derp (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The article's undeniably in quite poor shape, but WP:POLITICIAN (#1, sentence 1) makes it clear that being a member of a state legislature establishes notability. Magister Scienta talk 01:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Evidently notable per WP:POLITICIAN M1rtyn (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable as state legislator. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep This article should have been tagged as an unreferenced BLP, rather than nominated for deletion. As a member of the state legislature she passes WP:POLITICIAN by definition. I have wikified the article and added references. --MelanieN (talk) 07:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep - Topic passes point 1 of WP:POLITICIAN, and topic is notable per references added to the article by User:MelanieN. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.