Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CypherDen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 10:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

CypherDen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG.

The all of the sources listed here are either primary, or trivial mentions. Sources include the secondary sources listed here: 1, 2. These are somewhat reliable, but again, they're just trivial mentions.

For another example, the article lists her personal portfolio and college newsletter as sources. A personal portfolio is a primary source and doesn't necessarily credit notability and a college newsletter is a trivial publication at best.

I tried to search for some media publications on the subject but I couldn't find any that is a verified publisher or meets the notability standards (most of the sources being primary and trivial mentions). This article cannot be expanded as a result, as there is a severe lack of in-depth coverage to establish notability. Sparkl talk 16:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  Sparkl talk 16:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  Sparkl talk 16:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable youtuber and does not have reliable sources. `~HelpingWorld~` (👻👻) 05:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete – fails the GNG. The only independent sources cited in the article are clearly no more than passing mentions, and my search was unable to find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Possibly too soon. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.