Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cypress Creek Town Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 01:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Cypress Creek Town Center

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Recommended deletion per WP:CRYSTAL. Mall does not appear to be notable, it is under construction and has no tenants. Nen yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 23:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

I have cited three articles from the St. Petersburg Times regarding the status and prominence of this mall. There is no reason this should be deleted. If you delete this article, delete every other article about malls along with it. Thank you.Blaze33541 23:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep the articles do show sufficient local notability, though they seem almost indistinguishable from PR in their contents. DGG (talk) 00:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep megamall that makes specific claims of notability in the article supported by multiple reliable and verifiable sources to meet the Notability standard. Despite the widely held misinterpretation that WP:CRYSTAL prohibits any event or development that will occur at any point in the future, the policy actually states that "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, provided that discussion is properly referenced." Every statement is verifiably sourced and referenced, and would more than meet Wikipedia standards of notability if the mall had already been built. Alansohn 00:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Alansohn, I fully concur. There is no speculation regarding this project. The construction is underway, occuring as we speak. Although on a grander scale, the project of Burj Dubai draws comparison to this. Not yet completed, but well underway with solid and definite progress as pointed out by published sources.Blaze33541 01:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per DGG. Doesn't violate WP:CRYSTAL; every claim in the article is sourced to a reliable source. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 02:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Is it part of the Globex Corporation...? Lugnuts 07:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Not part of Globex, but it is in the Hammock District. Alansohn 20:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources say all permits received, completion expected 2008, super-regional at 1.3 to 1.5 million square feet, "2nd largest in region". Precedent in 2007 has been the keeping of superregional malls. Edison 20:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG and Edison, there is sufficient notability demonstrated here. Burntsauce 21:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG and Edison. The nom seems to have misunderstood WP:CRYSTAL. --Oakshade 05:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.