Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus-Mongolia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 10:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Cyprus-Mongolia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another laughable random combination from the obsessive article creator. non resident embassies, 1 minor agreement of 25 years ago LibStar (talk) 11:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - another one of those unsourced, trivial pairings that could never pass WP:N. - Biruitorul Talk 13:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not surprisingly, there is little evidence of common ground between landlocked Mongolia and Mediterranean Sea island Cyprus. Mandsford (talk) 14:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  15:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of non-trivial coverage, though the agreement they had 25 years ago makes me believe that there might be some coverage out there concerning their bi-lateral relations. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 16:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory, and the current addresses of consulates and status of diplomatic relations is better kept up to date via a link from the article about the country to its foreign relations department website, than having thousands of stale robostubs. Edison (talk) 18:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 13:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 13:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 13:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, how in the world does this demonstrate notability? Nyttend (talk) 14:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone actually finds something, this is too unlikely to keep around. DGG (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, centralized discussion has started (Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations), it makes sense to see and wait if that leads to usable outcome for this class of articles in general. --Reinoutr (talk) 09:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. it was heading for WP:SNOW LibStar (talk) 13:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't be silly, any proper reasoning to keep an article should be taken into account. In this case, centralized discussion has started, so it makes perfect sense to pause the deletion of such articles while people try to develop a guideline. No harm is done by leaving these articles a few weeks longer. Finally, AfD is not a vote and I am sure we can trust the closing admin to weigh in all the comments in a way he or she sees fit at that time. And so what if it "was heading for SNOW", proper debate should always be allowed. --Reinoutr (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.