Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrill Stachniss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Cyrill Stachniss

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable enough per BIO. A. L. M. 13:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Nsk92 (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WoS indicates that this person participated in a few well-cited projects under his advisor, Wolfram Burgard, but that he's not yet notable independent of his advisor. Essentially, he's an early-in-career academic (grad in '06) who has a (low) h-index of 4, commensurate with what you'd expect for his career stage. His website indicates he's still a post-doc (under same advisor). Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC).
 * Weak delete. His work has attracted a substantial level of citation but there is no way to disentangle his contribution from that of his more notable advisor. A classical example of someone on a successful academic career trajectory but whose article was created too soon in his career, before he has had a real chance to distinguish himself. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.