Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrk (Art)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Centrx at 22:22, 9 June 2009 as a copyright violation (non-admin closure). Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 14:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Cyrk (Art)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

De facto copyvio in the eyes of the licensing transition. Only GFDL content originally not published on a Wiki added before November 2008 can be transitioned..

Thus in the eyes of the transition, it is a copyvio because it is incompatible with the new policy requiring it at least be usable under the CC-BY-SA license, which this cannot because it was not added to Wikipedia before the cutoff. ViperSnake151 Talk  23:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Topic appears somewhat notable (cf. http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/33742.html ) and the technicality of copyvio can be addressed by editing back to stub. Edit, not delete. Enki H. (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Stubify if needed, and try to obtain CC-compatible authorization from source site. MLauba (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn. We need to handle this better. AFD is not the answer...yet. But CCPermissionNeeded might be. ViperSnake151 Talk  18:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.