Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Czech resistance to Nazi occupation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Prolly shouldn'ta AfD'd in the first place... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 00:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Czech resistance under Nazi occupation
Essay-ish entry with material covered in other articles. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. -- JJay 01:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Notable, encyclopedic topic, well-written, not a copyvio (unlike what seems like most of what gets submitted here); if the opening seems a little thesis-like, it's not original research, but well referenced to historians (later editors can balance it out a little). I also wikified it/cleaned it up a little.  CanadianCaesar 01:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Also moved it to Czech resistance to Nazi occupation (What exactly were they resisting "under Nazi occupation"?) CanadianCaesar 02:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep You might have said which other articles. I am not going to look for you. CalJW 02:51, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable topic with verifiable information. Well done Canadian Caesar for the rewrite. Capitalistroadster 03:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but it wasn't really a rewrite, just some small fixes. CanadianCaesar 04:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable historical topic.  Movementarian 04:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. --Apostrophe 05:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Topic is encyclopedic, historical, and can be expanded. Need to make the first sentence consistent with whatever the title is going to be. &mdash;Brim 05:06, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Canadian Ceasar. Nice work! Hamster Sandwich 05:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The Strongest Possible Keep. Wikipedia articles are, by nature, essays.  What is not allowed is Original Research essays.  Logophile 06:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Why is this even on AfD, as per above?  --Thephotoman 07:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, good historical article. Baffling nomination. --Squiddy 11:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep interesting historical topic. Could be expanded in some way (for example mentions about Munich agreement - the psycho-effect of this betrayal of allies for Czechs) Szalas
 * STRONG KEEP In fact I dont think I've ever felt a stronger KEEP vote coming over me!! The article is encyclopeadic, seems well researched and has a definate place in Wikipedia. (Delete nominator? ;-> ) Jcuk 20:51, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It covers only early years of war but that could be improved. Pavel Vozenilek 22:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.