Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dániel Sváb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 14:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Dániel Sváb

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Having never played for a fully pro team, this person fails WP:NSPORT, and there is insufficient coverage for him to meet WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 15:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for the moment. He does fail WP:NFOOTBALL, having never played in a fully professional league or for his nation's senior team. I was unable to find any coverage in English sources, but perhaps someone would be able to find some significant coverage in Hungarian sources? Anyway, my !vote is delete for the moment, but I'm willing to switch to support if someone more skilled than me can prove he passes the WP:GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. He appeared in a League Cup match in July 2010 according to Ferencváros' official website, but doesn't appear to have played in a league match yet. He has played in Nemzeti Bajnokság II for Ferencváros II, but that isn't a fully professional league. Argyle 4 Life  talk  20:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per argyle and giantsnowman MacMedtalk stalk 22:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence article satisfies the GNG or other notability guidelines. Jogurney (talk) 22:41, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.