Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dávid Balázs Horváth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Dávid Balázs Horváth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. Refs seem to point to the fact he is a compassionate veterinarian. Unable to determine the location details of environment prize after extensive search. Most links are blogs but with some coverage. Could be notable? scope_creep (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Reads like a resume. I can't see any more evidence of WikiNotability in the Hungarian article and its references than in the English one - which is, none at all. Egon Schmidt looks as if he could be notable, but I can't find any evidence that recipients of the prize named after him are notable per se. I suspect also that Ferencvárosi Kutyatartók Érdekvédelmi Civil Szervezete might not pass WP:NORG. Narky Blert (talk) 23:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I am not able to make head or tail of all these Hungarian references, so that's a bit of a hindrance in assessing notability... :/ -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Use Google Translate or better Bing Translate on the pages the reference are linked, and then have a read, determine if you think the ref is good enough for the article, and that the refs make the articles subject notable. There is no magic about it, only work. scope_creep (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I found the Egon Schmidt page, but couldn't determine how valid or prestigious it was. If it was international then certainly he would be notable. If the editor could come in and provide some guidance. scope_creep (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.