Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D-Ceased


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

D-Ceased

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable performer, sourced only to his own website. No hits Google news, no sources found in other locations, no real assertion of notability that's not promotional. The creator has repeatedly removed speedy deletion templates (placed by another editor, not myself) so I have no faith in a PROD. — chro • man • cer 01:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree' If there aren't any reliable sources other than his website, then there's no way of knowing if it's encyclopedic. SwisterTwister (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of notability; unreferenced BLP  Chzz  ► 12:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - should have been speedied per A7. Where is the concept of a "premature" speedy deletion discussed? ukexpat (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7.--Breawycker (talk to me!) 14:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I suppose the problem with 'underground' artists is that there's often nothing tangible to indicate their notability, which is the case here. TehGrauniad (talk) 21:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — ukexpat (talk) 15:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — ukexpat (talk) 15:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.