Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D-Witt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

D-Witt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable rapper - no in depth coverage and the sources in the article are blatantly fake sources run by blackhat SEO firms and otherwise unreliable. Praxidicae (talk) 11:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, no RS to be found. Caro7200 (talk) 12:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Borderline speedy delete via G11. Zero chance of passing any notability standard. And per nom, sources are wholly unreliable. I'm starting to find a high correlation between the use of exclamation marks in reference titles and unreliability. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom/Sulfur. Big shout out to the deleting admin, dropping it dropping it AfD styleee 😃 ——  SN  54129  08:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi please do not delete D-Witt article I'm working hard to improve it daily the article is not empty! Please help me to not delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scoffworld (talk • contribs) 18:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , I would like you to read WP:NEWARTICLE, which explains that you can't use this argument. Just because you are still working on the article doesn't mean it's a good excuse, especially when considering deletion based on notability. Koridas  ( Speak ) 17:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Only significant coverage is from paid/fake sources. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable sourcing. All of them are primary or passing sources, and some of them cite the same source over and over. Koridas  ( Speak ) 17:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 16:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV, WP:MILL. Many thousands of musicians, professional and amateur, have "attended" SXSW. There's zero evidence of touring, reviews, deals, awards, or acclaim outside of the locality of Rockford, Illinois. If this were 2007, a fan's advocacy could be excused, but it's 2020, and everybody knows we are not a "MusicSpaceFaceIn" for rappers. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 01:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.