Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.A.V. Public School, Thane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep. Nomination lacks any articulated substantial reason for deletion.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 16:41, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

D.A.V. Public School, Thane

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable school. McWomble (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment – Without going into any discussion, how did you evaluate this school to be non-notable? =Nichalp   «Talk»=  14:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This nomination must surely be in error. The article was nominated for deletion within minutes of being created. A few quick Google searches establishes that this is a respected private school in India which caters for children of all ages from nursery right through to about age 18. Dahliarose (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The school is notable I believe, at the very least it teaches up to the high school level and high schools are generally notable. And this school does more than that and is overall well known. --Banime (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I should also like to hear from the nominator how the processes in WP:BEFORE were carried out in less than two minutes bearing in mind that that time also included preparing the AFD? Not only is this a notable school, that includes a grade 12 high school, but there are plenty of sources to meet WP:N and a clear claim to notability in hosting an international science fair. TerriersFan (talk) 16:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hangon: Don't delete articles that soon after creation if there's any reasonable chance of notability. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

This is an open and shut case and I hope some admin closes it early. Let's not waste any further resources debating on this because, clearly the nominator has erred this time by not giving a sufficient reason why this is non-notable. I'm still waiting for him/her to outline the reasons why it is not notable. Just for the record, the school is notable – I'll list the reasons should anyone yell "Not Notable". =Nichalp  «Talk»=  19:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The nominator of the article is a six-day old wikipedian. Salih  ( talk ) 07:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No. First edit was made in February this year. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  07:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry. That was an error in my judgement. I am striking out my comment. Salih  ( talk ) 08:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.