Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.W. the Picky Eater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

D.W. the Picky Eater

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Basically just an episode of "Arthur". No reason for it to exist as a separate article from List of Arthur episodes. JuJube (talk) 04:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Also added because it has basically the same issues:


 * Delete. Looks like they are only plot summaries with no use on Wikipedia. Not all episodes need to have an article on Wikipedia because many television episodes are not notable. Also, the "Dancing Fools" article looks to me like a copyright violation due to the fact that it links to Youtube videos of the episode. Mythdon (talk) 05:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Arthurcuft with no sourcing or individual notability, and no need for a redirect.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to List of Arthur episodes. This doesn't belong here, it belongs to the episode list. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete. This article (Dancing Fools) if we keep adding onto it could have some potential. It just needs some images, and addition to the plot. Plus, why do we have all those articles for episodes of Seinfeld? Elbutler (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Because they have sources documenting their real-world relevance as a cultural phenomenon. JuJube (talk) 00:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Elbutler, I suggest that next time you want an article kept on Wikipedia, say keep, not do not delete. Mythdon (talk) 04:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * delete as non notable and no real world wources. Also the plan to improve it by "adding plot" would make it even more deletion worthy.Yobmod (talk) 09:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Move. I suppose i could move this article to my sandbox? Or make it a sub-page to my userpage? Elbutler (talk) 11:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I believe you can freely move the content to your user-page/sub page, where you can work on the content. If it eventually meets WP:OR, WP:WAF, and WP:N, it can be re-added as a regular page.--  StarScream1007  ►Talk  16:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Okay then if anyone is against this move speak now. Elbutler (talk) 19:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay i'm moving it now Elbutler (talk) 20:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Elbuter. Why did you move that page to your userspace. It seems to me your trying to evade those pages deletions. Correct?. Mythdon (talk) 09:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Here's another reason why this page should be kept...The Alien Costume is just another episode of Spider-Man and you kept it, and don't say it's important because it isn't. You're only just deleting this page becuase it's a page from a less popular tv show, if i created an article page for Home Improvement, or Superman: The Animated Series you would keep it. Also why do we have a page for the BTAS episode Almost Got 'Im it's just another episode of Batman? Now correct me if i'm wrong, but it think you guys are deliberatley picking on me!!!!! Elbutler (talk) 14:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was never involved in a deletion discussion about The Alien Costume. Also, we are in no way picking you. These articles should be deleted and that is final. Mythdon (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The fact is, articles about Spider-Man and Batman episodes usually have quite a number of outside sources, whereas you'll likely never get any people talking about particular "Arthur" episodes. JuJube (talk) 04:57, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.