Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D2M (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

D2M
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Borderline promotional article. Out of the two references provided, one of them is merely a link to the alumni page of a graduate school, and the other is a news story with only the vaguest of references to D2M (and doesn't even mention the company my name). Cannot find anything on Google other than mentions in various directory sites. Tagged for and  since 1st October, concerns have not been addressed. Not enough to establish notability IMO, and comes close to a G11 speedy. (Note: previous AfD was about a band with the same name. No other connections.) Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:COMPANY. ThePointblank (talk) 06:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.