Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D7 Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

D7 Church

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Contested prod, my prod rationale having been "Article about a recently formed congregation that seems to fail to satisfy the WP:GNG, as I can find no substantive treatment in reliable, independent sources." None of the sources cited in the article appear to be independent, and all the nontrivial edits to it have seemingly been from involved single-purpose accounts. Deor (talk) 00:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Deor. --Nlu (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Obviously a young (<1yr) church in an impoverished area with community interests beyond church services   like Gloucester’s restoration and unemployment  with a very active contemporary band   . Its pastor has been interviewed on BBC radio  and I suspect some users will be interesting in reading its article. Eudemis (talk) 04:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete'. Yes, it's very hard for a church less than one year old to establish notability, but Wikipedia doesn't make allowances for that, nor does it make allowances for perceived worthiness of an organisation. At the moment, its coverage amounts to a few articles in a local paper and little more. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for a lack of established notability. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - as currently non-notable. The option of restoring the article or starting a new version of the article when notability is established always remains. John Carter (talk) 01:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.