Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DB Systel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

DB Systel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

subsidiary of another company that predominately provides services to the owning company. No indication of notability. Independent references given are either standard announcements are not directly about this company. noq (talk) 13:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * As I am a DB Systel employee, I just wanted to have the profile up to date and in english as well. Would it help to delete products and services but to have only a short description of the main business? There are no external references because no external business partners would profit - there are non. We only offer services for Deutsche Bahn AG (99%). BeraterKuZu (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That pretty much says it does not meet the notability requirements. noq (talk) 21:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe you are right from that point of view. But I think that it is notable, which company manages the ticket vending machines for German Railway, or e.g. the passenger information system. Please let me know if I may edit the existing article. BeraterKuZu (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Nothing to stop you trying to improve the article, but unless you can add something that shows notability the article is likely to be deleted. Also please read WP:conflict of interest before making any edits to the article. noq (talk) 08:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Although I'm really not happy with what you say, I understand. So please delete the article but it would be great if I may stay a wiki-member. It was fun and maybe I can add some content somewhere else sometime.BeraterKuZu (talk) 21:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There is nothing personal in this and I hope you will stay and contribute - as you say it is fun to do. noq (talk) 00:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  00:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Self published, promotional, material, the own author consented with page deleting. Eduemoni</b><sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓ </b> 03:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Deutsche Bahn, its parent company. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 04:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.