Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DCHQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

DCHQ

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Nothing significant but another startup company. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a software product directory. Light2021 (talk) 16:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - sources not good, closest to an RS is Venturebeat and they run almost anything sent to them - David Gerard (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and this is honestly tickling at A7 material as the only things here are the barebone thin claims of "their software being used", nothing else here at all, I mean literally, comes close for substance (sources are trivial); this is business listing material, and that's exactly what we delete. SwisterTwister   talk
 * Comment This company was acquired by a company named Gridstore, which changed their name to HyperGrid after the acquisition. Details, details, details, details, details, details. (This is not a vote.) 2602:306:3A29:9B90:892B:720A:D76D:82AE (talk) 08:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly too soon. Need to last more than a year! Maybe some day a combined article including this kid, Gridstore, HyperGrid, SuperHyperGrid, MetaSuperHyperGrid, WhateverTheyCallThemselves etc. but not this one. W Nowicki (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete There is literally no claim of significance here. Coverage in RS is almost non-existent which doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.