Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DESelect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

DESelect

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Borderline A7, but does have some claim of significance. The described company, founded in 2018, does not have the required sourcing for WP:NCORP. Coverage that is out there is mainly rehashes of their PR on product releases.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;]) 08:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  10:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Move to Draft per nom. Article also got previously deleted (and was presumably created by the same user) and seems to be using it as a draft (see ). dibbydib 11:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't think a draft is warranted here, as the company is unlikely to become notable in 6 months.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;]) 11:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable company. lack of independent reliable secondary resources. fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.  D My Son  12:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - doesn't meet WP:GNG. --DannyS712 (talk) 16:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.